##两部门发布土地执法查处领域违法建(构)筑物没收处置行政非诉执行监督典型案例
**中新网8月22日电** 据最高检网站消息，日前，最高人民检察院、自然资源部联合发布土地执法查处领域违法建(构)筑物没收处置行政非诉执行监督典型案例。
此次发布的4件典型案例分别是：四川省某农业发展有限公司非法占地行政非诉执行检察监督案，广西某市某区某投资公司非法占地行政非诉执行检察监督案，河北省某市自然资源和规划局某分局申请强制执行张某退还土地、没收违法建筑物行政非诉执行检察监督案，黑龙江省某市某县非法占地行政非诉执行检察监督案。
这四起案件均涉及违法占地、违法建设，并最终因行政机关未及时申请强制执行而导致违法行为得不到有效制止。最高检和自然资源部通过发布典型案例，旨在督促各地检察机关和自然资源部门加强行政非诉执行监督，规范行政执法行为，切实维护国家土地资源权益。
**案例一：四川省某农业发展有限公司非法占地行政非诉执行检察监督案**
该案中，某农业发展有限公司未经审批，擅自占用86.23亩土地修建餐饮服务和户外拓展场地。当地综合行政执法局作出行政处罚决定，责令其退还土地并没收违法建筑物，但未及时申请法院强制执行。最终，检察机关介入监督，督促行政机关依法履行职责，确保行政处罚决定得到有效执行。
**案例二：广西某市某区某投资公司非法占地行政非诉执行检察监督案**
该案中，某投资公司未经审批，擅自占用土地进行开发建设。当地自然资源部门作出行政处罚决定，责令其退还土地并没收违法建筑物，但因程序不规范，导致执行过程出现问题。检察机关介入监督，督促行政机关完善程序，规范执行行为，最终促使违法建筑物被拆除。
**案例三：河北省某市自然资源和规划局某分局申请强制执行张某退还土地、没收违法建筑物行政非诉执行检察监督案**
该案中，张某未经审批，擅自占用土地修建房屋。当地自然资源部门申请法院强制执行，但因证据不足，导致执行程序受阻。检察机关介入监督，督促行政机关完善证据材料，最终促使法院依法作出强制执行裁定。
**案例四：黑龙江省某市某县非法占地行政非诉执行检察监督案**
该案中，某县政府未经审批，擅自占用土地进行建设。当地检察机关介入监督，督促县政府依法履行职责，最终促使县政府依法拆除违法建筑物。
最高检和自然资源部表示，将继续加强行政非诉执行监督，督促各地检察机关和自然资源部门依法履职，切实维护国家土地资源权益，维护社会公平正义。
英语如下：
##Two Departments Release Typical Cases of Confiscation and Disposal of Illegal Buildings in LandEnforcement
**Keywords:** Confiscation of illegal buildings, two departments, supervisorycases
**Content:**
**BEIJING, Aug. 22 (Xinhua)** — The Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) andthe Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) jointly released typical cases of administrative non-litigation execution supervision in the field of land law enforcement concerning the confiscationand disposal of illegally constructed buildings.
The four typical cases released are:
* **Case 1: Administrative non-litigation execution supervision case of illegal land occupation by a certain agricultural development company in Sichuan Province**
In thiscase, the agricultural development company, without approval, illegally occupied 86.23 mu (about 57.5 acres) of land to build catering services and outdoor expansion facilities. The local comprehensive administrative law enforcement bureau issued anadministrative penalty decision, ordering it to return the land and confiscate the illegal buildings, but failed to apply for court enforcement in a timely manner. Ultimately, the procuratorial organs intervened in supervision, urging the administrative organs to perform their duties in accordance with the law, ensuring that the administrative penalty decision was effectively implemented.
* **Case 2: Administrative non-litigation execution supervision case of illegal land occupation by a certain investment company in a certain district of a certain city in Guangxi**
In this case, the investment company, without approval, illegally occupied land for development and construction. The local natural resources department issued an administrativepenalty decision, ordering it to return the land and confiscate the illegal buildings, but due to procedural irregularities, problems arose in the execution process. The procuratorial organs intervened in supervision, urging the administrative organs to improve procedures, standardize execution behavior, and ultimately led to the demolition of the illegal buildings.
* **Case3: Administrative non-litigation execution supervision case of the application for compulsory execution by a certain branch of the Natural Resources and Planning Bureau of a certain city in Hebei Province for Zhang to return land and confiscate illegal buildings**
In this case, Zhang, without approval, illegally occupied land to build ahouse. The local natural resources department applied for court enforcement, but due to insufficient evidence, the execution process was hindered. The procuratorial organs intervened in supervision, urging the administrative organs to improve evidence materials, ultimately prompting the court to issue a ruling for compulsory execution.
* **Case 4: Administrative non-litigation execution supervision case of illegal land occupation in a certain county of a certain city in Heilongjiang Province**
In this case, the county government, without approval, illegally occupied land for construction. The local procuratorial organs intervened in supervision, urging the county government to perform its duties in accordance with the law,ultimately leading to the county government’s demolition of the illegal buildings.
The SPP and MNR stated that they will continue to strengthen administrative non-litigation execution supervision, urge procuratorial organs and natural resources departments at all levels to perform their duties in accordance with the law, effectively safeguard the country’sland resources rights, and maintain social fairness and justice.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2024/08-22/10272752.shtml
Views: 1