江西11岁男孩留遗书跳楼案”二审维持原判。中新网5月17日电 据江西省九江市中级人民法院官方微信公众号消息，2024年5月17日上午，江西省九江市中级人民法院对上诉人张某某、汪某某诉原审被告人邹某侮辱、虐待被看护人一案进行二审公开宣判。部分人大代表、政协委员旁听了宣判。
这起悲剧发生在2023年，当时一名11岁的男孩在家中留下遗书后跳楼身亡。遗书中透露了其长期受到邹某的虐待和侮辱。事发后，张某某和汪某某作为男孩的监护人，将邹某告上法庭，指控其侮辱、虐待被看护人。
一审法院经审理认为，邹某作为男孩的看护人，对其进行侮辱、虐待，情节恶劣，其行为已构成侮辱、虐待被看护人罪。据此，一审法院判决邹某有期徒刑三年。
邹某不服一审判决，提出上诉。在二审过程中，九江市中级人民法院经审理认为，原审法院判决认定事实清楚，证据确实、充分，适用法律正确，审判程序合法。因此，二审法院维持了一审判决。
这起案件引起了社会广泛关注，人大代表、政协委员等社会各界人士旁听了二审宣判。这起案件的公正审理，体现了司法机关对未成年人权益的保护，对恶劣虐待行为的严厉打击。同时，也警示社会，看护人应当切实履行看护职责，尊重、爱护未成年人，防止类似悲剧再次发生。
我国法律明确规定，未成年人享有生存权、发展权、受保护权、参与权等权利。任何组织和个人都不得侵害未成年人的合法权益。监护人、看护人作为未成年人的法定看护人，更有义务保护未成年人的身心健康。这起案件的审理，有助于强化社会对未成年人权益保护的认识，提高全社会对未成年人保护的关注度。
九江市中级人民法院提醒，如果发现未成年人受到虐待、侮辱等行为，应当及时向有关部门报告，共同守护未成年人的健康成长。
英语如下：
### News Title: Second-instance Court Upholds Original Verdict in Jiangxi 11-year-old Boy’s Suicide Case; Charge of Abusing a Caregiver Upheld
### Keywords: Jiangxi Boy, Suicide Note, Second-instance Court Upholds Original Verdict
#### News Content:
The “Jiangxi 11-year-old Boy’s Suicide Note Case” saw the second-instance court uphold the original verdict. According to the official WeChat account of the Jiangxi Province Jiujiang City Intermediate People’s Court, on the morning of May 17, 2024, the Jiujiang City Intermediate People’s Court公开宣判ed the second-instance trial of Zhang XXX and Wang XXX versus the original defendant Zou XX for defamation and abuse of a caregiver. Some people’s representatives and political advisors attended the public announcement.
This tragedy occurred in 2023 when an 11-year-old boy in Jiangxi left a suicide note and jumped to his death. The note revealed long-term abuse and humiliation by Zou XX. After the incident, Zhang XXX and Wang XXX, as the boy’s guardians, sued Zou XX to the court, accusing him of defamation and abuse of a caregiver.
The first-instance court considered that Zou XX, as the boy’s caregiver, committedhumiliation and abuse, with serious circumstances, constituting the crime of defaming and abusing a caregiver. Accordingly, the first-instance court sentenced Zou XX to three years in prison.
Zou XX appealed against the first-instance judgment. In the second-instance trial, the Intermediate People’s Court of Jiujiang City held that the original court’s judgment was clear on the facts, supported by sufficient evidence, and correctly applied the law, with a legal trial process. Therefore, the second-instance court maintained the original judgment.
This case has drawn widespread attention from society, with people’s representatives, political advisors, and other members of society attending the second-instance public announcement. The fair trial of this case reflects the judiciary’s protection of the rights and interests of minors and the severe crackdown on severe abuse. At the same time, it also alerts society that caregivers should fulfill their duties, respect and love minors, and prevent similar tragedies from happening again.
China’s laws explicitly state that minors have the right to life, development, protection, and participation. No organization or individual may infringe upon the legal rights and interests of minors. Guardians and caregivers, as the legal guardians of minors, have an even greater obligation to protect their physical and mental health. The trial of this case helps to strengthen society’s understanding of the protection of minors’ rights and interests and raise the overall awareness of protecting minors.
The Intermediate People’s Court of Jiujiang City reminds that if any abuse, humiliation, or other behaviors against minors are discovered, it should be reported to the relevant departments in a timely manner to jointly safeguard the healthy growth of minors.
【来源】http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2024/05-17/10218263.shtml
Views: 1