【OpenAI指控《纽约时报》非法侵入ChatGPT，引发版权诉讼新风波】
据IT之家报道，人工智能研究实验室OpenAI近日向美联邦法官提出申请，要求驳回《纽约时报》对其提起的部分版权诉讼。OpenAI宣称，《纽约时报》采取了不正当手段，侵入了其知名聊天机器人ChatGPT及其他AI系统，以此制造误导性的证据，为之前的诉讼提供支持。
据路透社和Ars Technica的报道，OpenAI直指《纽约时报》雇佣第三方人员破解了其产品，这一行为不仅侵犯了公司的知识产权，也对公众和法庭造成了误导。OpenAI的声明中强调，这种非法侵入行为扭曲了事实，对公司的声誉和技术创新构成了严重威胁。
此次争议源于《纽约时报》早前对OpenAI的版权侵权指控，而OpenAI现在反诉《纽约时报》的行为可能构成不正当竞争和侵犯商业秘密。此案的进展将对AI行业的版权保护和新闻调查的界限设定产生深远影响，引发了业界的广泛关注。
目前，《纽约时报》尚未对此事发表官方回应。法律专家指出，此案的关键在于确定《纽约时报》获取证据的方式是否合法，以及这是否会影响其诉讼的正当性。美联邦法院将对这一复杂问题进行审理，以确定各方的法律责任。
英语如下：
**News Title:** “OpenAI Accuses The New York Times of Illegally Hacking ChatGPT, Sparking Copyright Lawsuit Storm”
**Keywords:** OpenAI, The New York Times, Copyright Lawsuit
**News Content:**
**[OpenAI Accuses The New York Times of Unlawfully Penetrating ChatGPT, Triggering Copyright Lawsuit Controversy]**
According to IT Home, the artificial intelligence research lab OpenAI recently filed a motion with a US federal judge to dismiss part of a copyright lawsuit brought against it by The New York Times. OpenAI alleges that The New York Times used improper methods to infiltrate its renowned chatbot ChatGPT and other AI systems, creating misleading evidence to support an earlier lawsuit.
As reported by Reuters and Ars Technica, OpenAI specifically accuses The New York Times of hiring third parties to bypass its products, an act that it claims not only infringes on the company’s intellectual property but also misleads the public and the court. OpenAI’s statement emphasizes that this illegal intrusion has distorted the truth and poses a severe threat to the company’s reputation and technological innovation.
This dispute stems from The New York Times’ earlier allegations of copyright infringement against OpenAI, which has now led to a countersuit by OpenAI, potentially accusing The New York Times of unfair competition and misappropriation of trade secrets. The outcome of this case is expected to have a significant impact on copyright protection in the AI industry and the boundaries of news investigations, attracting widespread attention.
So far, The New York Times has not issued an official response to the matter. Legal experts point out that the crux of the case lies in determining the legality of The New York Times’ methods of acquiring evidence and whether this could affect the legitimacy of its lawsuit. The US federal court will now examine this complex issue to establish the respective legal responsibilities of the parties involved.
【来源】https://www.ithome.com/0/752/465.htm
Views: 2